Guatemalan vs Chinese Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Chinese
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Guatemalans
Chinese
7.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
307th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs Chinese Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 406,520,979 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.415 and weighted average of 7.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,670,469 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 3.6%, a difference of 93.0%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Guatemalan | Chinese |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 0.44% |
| Maximum | 42.2% | 17.1% |
| Range | 40.1% | 16.7% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 4.2% |
| Median | 9.3% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.1% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Spanish American Indian (7.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Hopi (7.1%, a difference of 0.78%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (7.1%, a difference of 0.81%), Immigrants from Dominica (7.1%, a difference of 0.86%), and Immigrants from Armenia (7.1%, a difference of 0.86%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 5.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 6.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |