Guatemalan vs Finnish Community Comparison
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Finnish
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Guatemalans
Finns
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,815
SOCIAL INDEX
65.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
141st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Finnish Integration in Guatemalan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,073,002 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Finns within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.322. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Finns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to an increase of 7.6 Finns.
Guatemalan vs Finnish Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 26.4%), median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $54,721, a difference of 17.1%), and median family income ($88,295 compared to $102,676, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $51,827, a difference of 0.59%), median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $38,173, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,526 compared to $59,535, a difference of 9.2%).
Income Metric | Guatemalan | Finnish |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,766 | Average $43,461 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,295 | Average $102,676 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,961 | Fair $83,607 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,205 | Fair $45,940 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,736 | Average $54,721 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,695 | Tragic $38,173 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,525 | Fair $51,827 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,331 | Average $94,610 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,705 | Average $99,904 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,526 | Poor $59,535 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.6% | Tragic 28.6% |
Guatemalan vs Finnish Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 69.1%), family poverty (11.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 51.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.38%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
Poverty Metric | Guatemalan | Finnish |
Poverty | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 20.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.4% | Fair 13.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.6% | Excellent 16.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.2% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.4% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 13.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.8% | Poor 21.5% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Tragic 16.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.9% | Tragic 30.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Guatemalan vs Finnish Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 30.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.2%), and unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Guatemalan | Finnish |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.1% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Fair 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Guatemalan vs Finnish Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 23.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.98%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Guatemalan | Finnish |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Tragic 64.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Fair 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.5% | Exceptional 43.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Exceptional 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.7% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.0% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.2% | Excellent 83.1% |
Guatemalan vs Finnish Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 35.1%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.4%), and births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.6%), family households (65.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 8.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Guatemalan | Finnish |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Tragic 63.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.9% | Tragic 26.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.3% | Exceptional 48.1% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.40 | Tragic 3.09 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.9% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.1% | Average 31.7% |
Guatemalan vs Finnish Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 43.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 11.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Guatemalan | Finnish |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Exceptional 92.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 54.1% | Exceptional 60.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.1% | Exceptional 22.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Guatemalan vs Finnish Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 137.0%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.7%), and master's degree (11.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.2%).
Education Level Metric | Guatemalan | Finnish |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
6th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
7th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
8th Grade | Tragic 91.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 89.9% | Exceptional 96.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 87.9% | Exceptional 95.8% |
11th Grade | Tragic 86.4% | Exceptional 94.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 93.4% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.0% | Exceptional 91.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 78.5% | Exceptional 88.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.8% | Excellent 66.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.2% | Good 60.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.5% | Average 46.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.0% | Fair 36.7% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.7% | Poor 14.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Poor 4.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Average 1.8% |
Guatemalan vs Finnish Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 31.1%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 29.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.95%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.2%).
Disability Metric | Guatemalan | Finnish |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Tragic 12.7% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 12.6% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.5% | Good 22.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.0% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Poor 6.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Good 2.4% |