Chickasaw vs Finnish Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Finnish
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Finns
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,815
SOCIAL INDEX
65.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
141st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Finnish Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,896,212 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Finns within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.024% in Finns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 24.4 Finns.
![Chickasaw Integration in Finnish Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-finns/chickasaw-vs-finns-community-integration.webp)
Chickasaw vs Finnish Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $99,904, a difference of 21.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $94,610, a difference of 21.4%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $102,676, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 5.2%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $59,535, a difference of 10.8%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $38,173, a difference of 10.9%).
![Chickasaw vs Finnish Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-finns/chickasaw-vs-finns-income.webp)
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Finnish |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Average $43,461 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Average $102,676 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Fair $83,607 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Fair $45,940 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Average $54,721 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $38,173 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Fair $51,827 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Average $94,610 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Average $99,904 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Poor $59,535 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 28.6% |
Chickasaw vs Finnish Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 40.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 39.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 7.4%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 11.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 13.9%).
![Chickasaw vs Finnish Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-finns/chickasaw-vs-finns-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Finnish |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 20.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Fair 13.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Excellent 16.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 13.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Poor 21.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 16.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 30.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Chickasaw vs Finnish Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 35.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.5%).
![Chickasaw vs Finnish Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-finns/chickasaw-vs-finns-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Finnish |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Fair 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Chickasaw vs Finnish Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%).
![Chickasaw vs Finnish Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-finns/chickasaw-vs-finns-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Finnish |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Fair 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 43.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Excellent 83.1% |
Chickasaw vs Finnish Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 24.1%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.09, a difference of 3.0%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 4.6%).
![Chickasaw vs Finnish Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-finns/chickasaw-vs-finns-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Finnish |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 48.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.09 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Average 31.7% |
Chickasaw vs Finnish Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.19%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
![Chickasaw vs Finnish Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-finns/chickasaw-vs-finns-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Finnish |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 92.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 60.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 22.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Chickasaw vs Finnish Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 24.0%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.24%).
![Chickasaw vs Finnish Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-finns/chickasaw-vs-finns-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Finnish |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.6% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.8% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 93.4% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 91.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 88.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Excellent 66.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Good 60.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Average 46.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Fair 36.7% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Poor 14.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Poor 4.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Average 1.8% |
Chickasaw vs Finnish Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 49.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 32.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 9.5%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 10.5%).
![Chickasaw vs Finnish Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-finns/chickasaw-vs-finns-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Finnish |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 12.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Good 22.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Poor 6.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Good 2.4% |