Immigrants from Asia vs Finnish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 398,458,192 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Finns within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.618. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Finns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 3.8 Finns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($99,933 compared to $83,607, a difference of 19.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,787 compared to $94,610, a difference of 17.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $99,904, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 6.0%), householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $51,827, a difference of 8.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $59,535, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 19.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 18.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.7%), poverty (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 19.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 28.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 18.2%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 16.2%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.3% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.98%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and married-couple households (49.1% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 41.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 65.7%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 33.5%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 49.6%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 34.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.16%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.4%).