Iroquois vs Finnish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,148,515 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Finns within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.115. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Finns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 9.2 Finns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $99,904, a difference of 14.5%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 14.0%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $102,676, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $38,173, a difference of 4.9%), median earnings ($42,430 compared to $45,940, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $51,827, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 38.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 38.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.7%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.1%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.7%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 20.7%), and married-couple households (43.7% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.09, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 42.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 14.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 10.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.0%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 13.8%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 22.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 18.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.36%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.6%).