Canadian vs Finnish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,371,595 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Finns within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.613. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.356% in Finns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 356.2 Finns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,858 compared to $43,461, a difference of 5.5%), median household income ($87,769 compared to $83,607, a difference of 5.0%), and median male earnings ($57,286 compared to $54,721, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $51,827, a difference of 0.98%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,625 compared to $94,610, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 9.2%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.70%), single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.79%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.58%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.74%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.4%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.2% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.11%), births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 0.87%), and currently married (48.3% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.69%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 14.7%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and master's degree (15.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (66.8% compared to 66.9%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 7.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 0.090%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.39%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.42%).