Immigrants vs Finnish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,769,575 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Finns within Immigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.802. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Finns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants corresponds to a decrease of 5.1 Finns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 13.8%), median female earnings ($39,328 compared to $38,173, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,201 compared to $51,827, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,943 compared to $99,904, a difference of 0.040%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,423 compared to $94,610, a difference of 0.20%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $59,535, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 44.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 32.3%), and family poverty (10.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.57%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 0.78%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 22.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 27.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.7%), family households with children (28.9% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 8.7%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.09, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.2%), births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 51.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 11.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 91.1%), college, under 1 year (62.5% compared to 66.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and high school diploma (85.8% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (36.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 0.10%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 0.63%), and nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 34.2%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 29.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.7%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 3.3%).