Mongolian vs Finnish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 128,849,487 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Finns within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Finns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to an increase of 17.4 Finns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,173 compared to $43,461, a difference of 13.1%), median household income ($93,971 compared to $83,607, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,602 compared to $99,904, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,540 compared to $51,827, a difference of 1.4%), wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,326 compared to $59,535, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.4%), receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 23.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 24.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.1%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 13.4%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.1%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.09, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 71.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 6.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 51.8%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 47.1%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.73%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.74%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 38.7%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 34.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.050%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.5%).