Sioux vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,011,613 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Sioux communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.362. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sioux within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sioux corresponds to a decrease of 16.5 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sioux and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,921 compared to $50,575, a difference of 49.1%), median household income ($67,792 compared to $95,146, a difference of 40.4%), and median family income ($82,386 compared to $115,230, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 14.0%), householder income under 25 years ($46,417 compared to $53,294, a difference of 14.8%), and median female earnings ($35,063 compared to $42,446, a difference of 21.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sioux and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (15.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 96.0%), married-couple family poverty (8.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 95.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (23.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 75.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 31.7%), single mother poverty (38.8% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 33.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 42.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sioux and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 93.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 86.1%), and male unemployment (8.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 67.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sioux and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.81%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sioux and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 59.1%), single mother households (8.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 51.0%), and births to unmarried women (41.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 2.7%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and average family size (3.52 compared to 3.15, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sioux and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 10.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.17%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sioux and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 81.9%), master's degree (10.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 71.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 70.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.9% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sioux and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 51.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 26.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.90%), disability age over 75 (49.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.2%).