Subsaharan African vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,692,453 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.083. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to an increase of 0.5 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,152 compared to $50,575, a difference of 26.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $105,085, a difference of 24.7%), and median family income ($93,748 compared to $115,230, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,691 compared to $53,294, a difference of 9.5%), median female earnings ($38,391 compared to $42,446, a difference of 10.6%), and median earnings ($44,118 compared to $51,246, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 42.0%), family poverty (10.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 34.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.5%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and single male poverty (13.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.0%), male unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.8%), and unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.97%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.81%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.7% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 39.0%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 20.8%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.15, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 19.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 14.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 45.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 41.9%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.71%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 15.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.80%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and male disability (11.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.1%).