Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs New Zealander Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
New Zealander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

New Zealanders

Fair
Excellent
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

New Zealander Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,155,628 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.184. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to a decrease of 3.8 New Zealanders.
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in New Zealander Communities

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs New Zealander Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,827 compared to $50,575, a difference of 27.0%), median family income ($94,472 compared to $115,230, a difference of 22.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $111,286, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $53,294, a difference of 9.3%), median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $42,446, a difference of 11.6%), and median earnings ($43,998 compared to $51,246, a difference of 16.5%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs New Zealander Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarNew Zealander
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,827
Exceptional
$50,575
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,472
Exceptional
$115,230
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,682
Exceptional
$95,146
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,998
Exceptional
$51,246
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,298
Exceptional
$61,199
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,028
Exceptional
$42,446
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,749
Exceptional
$53,294
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$86,736
Exceptional
$105,085
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,385
Exceptional
$111,286
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,114
Exceptional
$67,333
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Tragic
27.7%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs New Zealander Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 35.4%), family poverty (10.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 30.2%), and receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.24%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.98%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs New Zealander Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarNew Zealander
Poverty
Tragic
14.2%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
21.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.4%
Good
16.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Excellent
15.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Excellent
15.6%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Poor
13.2%
Single Females
Tragic
22.6%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Average
29.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.9%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs New Zealander Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.58%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs New Zealander Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarNew Zealander
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Good
5.3%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs New Zealander Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.92%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.36%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs New Zealander Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarNew Zealander
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.3%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Fair
82.6%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs New Zealander Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.5%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.9%), and married-couple households (43.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 0.48%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.3%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs New Zealander Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarNew Zealander
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
62.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.4%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.3%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.9%
Excellent
30.3%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.44%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.9%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarNew Zealander
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Good
10.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Exceptional
20.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Good
6.5%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs New Zealander Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 88.2%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 50.8%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs New Zealander Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarNew Zealander
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.7%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.5%
Exceptional
70.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.7%
Exceptional
51.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.5%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
18.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
2.5%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs New Zealander Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 11.9%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.2%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs New Zealander Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarNew Zealander
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Average
11.2%
Average
11.2%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Good
22.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Fair
17.4%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%