Immigrants from Romania vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,730,364 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Immigrant from Romania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.650. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Romania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.121% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Romania corresponds to an increase of 120.5 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,462 compared to $67,333, a difference of 4.4%), householder income under 25 years ($55,522 compared to $53,294, a difference of 4.2%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($51,337 compared to $51,246, a difference of 0.18%), median male earnings ($61,040 compared to $61,199, a difference of 0.26%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,713 compared to $105,085, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 20.6%), single male poverty (11.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and single female poverty (18.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.73%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 8.8%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (64.6% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.85%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.89%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.5%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 14.5%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.30%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and 2nd grade (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.060%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.3%).