Bhutanese vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,806,310 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.167. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 4.1 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $67,333, a difference of 7.4%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $53,294, a difference of 7.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $111,286, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($61,759 compared to $61,199, a difference of 0.91%), per capita income ($49,894 compared to $50,575, a difference of 1.4%), and median earnings ($52,297 compared to $51,246, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 24.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 24.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (12.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 7.2%), receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.68%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 8.9%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.64%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (48.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.2%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 16.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.5%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.0% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.0%), high school diploma (91.2% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and college, 1 year or more (64.6% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.99%), and disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.9%).