Bangladeshi vs New Zealander Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bangladeshi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
New Zealander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bangladeshis

New Zealanders

Fair
Excellent
2,611
SOCIAL INDEX
23.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
249th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

New Zealander Integration in Bangladeshi Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,132,597 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Bangladeshi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.081. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bangladeshis within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bangladeshis corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 New Zealanders.
Bangladeshi Integration in New Zealander Communities

Bangladeshi vs New Zealander Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,897 compared to $50,575, a difference of 40.9%), median male earnings ($46,744 compared to $61,199, a difference of 30.9%), and median family income ($88,358 compared to $115,230, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,589 compared to $53,294, a difference of 12.0%), median female earnings ($35,960 compared to $42,446, a difference of 18.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,719 compared to $67,333, a difference of 23.1%).
Bangladeshi vs New Zealander Income
Income MetricBangladeshiNew Zealander
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,897
Exceptional
$50,575
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,358
Exceptional
$115,230
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,112
Exceptional
$95,146
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,263
Exceptional
$51,246
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,744
Exceptional
$61,199
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,960
Exceptional
$42,446
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,589
Exceptional
$53,294
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,363
Exceptional
$105,085
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,402
Exceptional
$111,286
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,719
Exceptional
$67,333
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
27.7%

Bangladeshi vs New Zealander Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 51.6%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 35.1%), and family poverty (10.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.5%).
Bangladeshi vs New Zealander Poverty
Poverty MetricBangladeshiNew Zealander
Poverty
Tragic
14.8%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Tragic
16.0%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
21.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.9%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.6%
Good
16.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Excellent
15.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.0%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.0%
Excellent
15.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.3%
Poor
13.2%
Single Females
Tragic
24.2%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.2%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.7%
Average
29.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
9.9%

Bangladeshi vs New Zealander Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 18.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 16.4%), and male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.65%).
Bangladeshi vs New Zealander Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBangladeshiNew Zealander
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.6%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Good
5.3%

Bangladeshi vs New Zealander Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.37%).
Bangladeshi vs New Zealander Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBangladeshiNew Zealander
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
42.5%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.1%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Fair
82.6%

Bangladeshi vs New Zealander Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 46.9%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 44.9%), and births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 2.2%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.15, a difference of 6.8%).
Bangladeshi vs New Zealander Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBangladeshiNew Zealander
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Tragic
62.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
30.1%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.37
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.7%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.4%
Excellent
30.3%

Bangladeshi vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 17.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 7.4%).
Bangladeshi vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBangladeshiNew Zealander
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Good
10.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.4%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
20.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Good
6.5%

Bangladeshi vs New Zealander Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 111.9%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 106.8%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 92.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.9%), nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Bangladeshi vs New Zealander Education Level
Education Level MetricBangladeshiNew Zealander
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.4%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.3%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.9%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.4%
Exceptional
70.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.5%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.0%
Exceptional
51.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
18.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.2%
Exceptional
2.5%

Bangladeshi vs New Zealander Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 24.3%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.41%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.7%).
Bangladeshi vs New Zealander Disability
Disability MetricBangladeshiNew Zealander
Disability
Tragic
12.6%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.6%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.8%
Good
22.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.4%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.6%
Fair
17.4%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.3%