Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,078,062 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.521. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to an increase of 3.5 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($118,056 compared to $105,085, a difference of 12.3%), median household income ($104,796 compared to $95,146, a difference of 10.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,222 compared to $111,286, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.4%), householder income over 65 years ($69,872 compared to $67,333, a difference of 3.8%), and per capita income ($53,806 compared to $50,575, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 23.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 17.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.5%), male poverty (10.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and female poverty (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 10.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 18.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.88%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 21.2%), divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 15.8%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.15, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 33.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 4.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 41.4%), doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.3%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.4% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.63%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.76%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 24.8%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.050%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.8%).