Immigrants from France vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,469,323 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Immigrant from France communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.654. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from France within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.134% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from France corresponds to an increase of 134.1 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,557 compared to $50,575, a difference of 7.9%), median female earnings ($44,541 compared to $42,446, a difference of 4.9%), and median earnings ($53,490 compared to $51,246, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,826 compared to $67,333, a difference of 0.76%), householder income under 25 years ($53,805 compared to $53,294, a difference of 0.96%), and wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 10.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.1%), male poverty (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and receiving food stamps (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.85%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 4.7%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and married-couple households (45.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.25%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.73%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 27.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 15.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.3%), professional degree (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.2%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.8% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.20%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.0%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.23%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.83%).