Immigrants from Latvia vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,478,634 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.079. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 17.0 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $67,333, a difference of 4.7%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $53,294, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,454 compared to $111,286, a difference of 0.15%), median family income ($114,826 compared to $115,230, a difference of 0.35%), and median male earnings ($61,422 compared to $61,199, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (19.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 8.5%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.4%), female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and poverty (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.2%), family households with children (25.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.62%), currently married (46.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (62.0% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 18.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 11.0%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and master's degree (19.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.1% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.090%), college, under 1 year (70.1% compared to 70.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.020%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and female disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.87%).