Choctaw vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,616,419 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.444. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 8.8 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,999 compared to $50,575, a difference of 40.5%), median household income ($69,947 compared to $95,146, a difference of 36.0%), and median family income ($84,835 compared to $115,230, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $53,294, a difference of 17.3%), and median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $42,446, a difference of 25.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 43.7%), married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 11.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 36.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 29.8%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.4%), and births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.9%), currently married (46.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 29.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 84.5%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 73.2%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 65.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 57.1%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 56.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 27.9%).