Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yup'ik
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yup'ik

Immigrants from Chile

Fair
Good
2,388
SOCIAL INDEX
21.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
262nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Chile Integration in Yup'ik Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,145,557 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Yup'ik communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yup'ik within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yup'ik corresponds to a decrease of 2.2 Immigrants from Chile.
Yup'ik Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Chile Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,518 compared to $46,213, a difference of 51.4%), median male earnings ($39,504 compared to $55,954, a difference of 41.6%), and median family income ($79,290 compared to $105,655, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,727 compared to $62,354, a difference of 2.7%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,732 compared to $52,440, a difference of 4.4%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Chile Income
Income MetricYup'ikImmigrants from Chile
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,518
Exceptional
$46,213
Median Family Income
Tragic
$79,290
Excellent
$105,655
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,695
Excellent
$88,388
Median Earnings
Tragic
$35,942
Excellent
$47,697
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,504
Excellent
$55,954
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$32,730
Good
$40,353
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,732
Good
$52,440
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$73,688
Excellent
$97,159
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$81,000
Excellent
$103,412
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,727
Excellent
$62,354
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.7%
Average
25.7%

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (32.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 184.5%), single male poverty (31.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 161.8%), and married-couple family poverty (13.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 153.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (32.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 14.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 19.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 20.0%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty
Poverty MetricYup'ikImmigrants from Chile
Poverty
Tragic
20.8%
Average
12.2%
Families
Tragic
18.7%
Average
8.9%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Average
11.1%
Females
Tragic
21.5%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.3%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.7%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
25.1%
Good
15.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
24.7%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
25.8%
Good
15.9%
Single Males
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Tragic
26.6%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
32.5%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.5%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
13.4%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
32.7%
Good
11.5%

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (18.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 249.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (14.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 225.1%), and male unemployment (16.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 221.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (12.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 63.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (9.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 78.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (9.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 79.7%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYup'ikImmigrants from Chile
Unemployment
Tragic
13.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
10.9%
Average
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
23.7%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
41.0%
Tragic
18.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
17.9%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
18.5%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
9.5%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
9.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.6%
Good
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.0%
Fair
5.5%

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (73.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (76.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.1%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYup'ikImmigrants from Chile
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.7%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.2%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.3%
Tragic
34.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.9%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
73.1%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
76.4%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.3%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.6%
Exceptional
83.2%

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single father households (5.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 145.4%), births to unmarried women (56.4% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 81.0%), and single mother households (10.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 60.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 5.6%), family households (72.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and currently married (39.9% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 16.3%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYup'ikImmigrants from Chile
Family Households
Exceptional
72.4%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
37.0%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.1%
Average
46.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
4.00
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
10.0%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.9%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.3%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
56.4%
Good
31.2%

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (45.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 317.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (34.9% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 55.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 52.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 26.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 52.4%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYup'ikImmigrants from Chile
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
45.9%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
58.4%
Poor
89.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
34.9%
Poor
54.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.8%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Poor
6.1%

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (19.4% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 110.4%), master's degree (8.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 96.2%), and associate's degree (25.0% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 96.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.15%), 9th grade (95.2% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and 5th grade (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level
Education Level MetricYup'ikImmigrants from Chile
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.2%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
99.2%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
99.2%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
99.2%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
99.2%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.6%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.1%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.0%
Average
85.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
45.8%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
39.4%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
25.0%
Exceptional
49.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
16.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.1%

Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Chile Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (4.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 252.4%), hearing disability (5.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 108.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (37.8% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 71.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.77%), female disability (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.89%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.0%).
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from Chile Disability
Disability MetricYup'ikImmigrants from Chile
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
4.5%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
37.8%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
61.1%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.4%