Tongan vs Chinese Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
COMPARE
Tongan
Chinese
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Comparison
Tongans
Chinese
14.2%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tongan vs Chinese Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,882,516 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,186,861 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.065 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 8.4%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tongan | Chinese |
| Minimum | 3.1% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 37.9% | 53.8% |
| Range | 34.8% | 52.0% |
| Mean | 14.6% | 14.4% |
| Median | 13.6% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.0% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 18.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 12.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 10.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 10.7% |
Demographics Similar to Tongans and Chinese by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Immigrants from Lithuania (14.1%, a difference of 0.49%), Asian (14.0%, a difference of 1.4%), Cypriot (14.0%, a difference of 1.4%), Bulgarian (13.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (13.8%, a difference of 2.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Iranian (13.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Iran (13.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Burmese (13.2%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Korea (13.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (13.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Asians | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 14.2% |