Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from France Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,375,048 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from France within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.007. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from France. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Immigrants from France.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $108,257, a difference of 18.4%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $53,805, a difference of 15.4%), and median household income ($111,519 compared to $96,743, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($56,709 compared to $54,557, a difference of 3.9%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $66,826, a difference of 7.1%), and wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 25.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 22.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.42%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.48%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.79%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 22.9%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.4%), and single mother households (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.15, a difference of 3.6%), currently married (48.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.9%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 14.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 0.99%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 46.9%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and bachelor's degree (48.2% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (71.0% compared to 71.0%, a difference of 0.0%), master's degree (20.5% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 0.83%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 24.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 23.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 1.5%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.8%).