Immigrants from Croatia vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,982,613 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Croatia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.782. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Croatia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.433% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Croatia corresponds to an increase of 433.0 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,417 compared to $37,857, a difference of 33.2%), median male earnings ($60,914 compared to $49,190, a difference of 23.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,503 compared to $85,553, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,343 compared to $50,041, a difference of 8.6%), wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 10.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,168 compared to $56,722, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 38.4%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 30.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.76%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.46%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 46.2%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 40.8%), and family households with children (25.7% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.7% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 3.5%), family households (63.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 59.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 44.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 30.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 66.5%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 62.5%), and master's degree (17.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 27.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.3% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 22.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.0%).