Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,612,832 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.143. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.043% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 42.7 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,663 compared to $37,857, a difference of 20.6%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 15.1%), and median family income ($106,183 compared to $92,239, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $50,041, a difference of 0.68%), householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $56,722, a difference of 7.5%), and median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $36,841, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 50.8%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 46.6%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.1%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.7%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.0%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 37.9%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.2%), and births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.2%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.34, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 52.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 0.19%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 98.3%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 42.3%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 22.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 22.2%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.4%).