Hungarian vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 191,418,830 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Hungarian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.791. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hungarians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.060% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hungarians corresponds to an increase of 59.8 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 21.8%), per capita income ($45,426 compared to $37,857, a difference of 20.0%), and median male earnings ($57,309 compared to $49,190, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,247 compared to $50,041, a difference of 0.41%), median female earnings ($39,510 compared to $36,841, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,673 compared to $56,722, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 24.9%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 22.6%), and family poverty (8.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 2.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 13.8%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 35.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 31.7%), and births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.64%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.34, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 97.7%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 42.9%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 23.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 16.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.22%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.45%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.47%).