Immigrants from Jamaica vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,277,383 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Jamaica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.137. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jamaica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jamaica corresponds to a decrease of 2.6 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.8% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 26.5%), householder income over 65 years ($54,027 compared to $56,722, a difference of 5.0%), and median female earnings ($38,625 compared to $36,841, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($43,026 compared to $42,884, a difference of 0.33%), householder income under 25 years ($51,038 compared to $50,041, a difference of 2.0%), and median male earnings ($48,040 compared to $49,190, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 28.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 25.9%), and receiving food stamps (16.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.24%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 31.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 29.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.2% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 26.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.3%), births to unmarried women (38.8% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 14.1%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.33 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.10%), family households (64.7% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.98%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 74.6%), no vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 74.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.8% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 7.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.5% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 33.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 52.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 28.3%), master's degree (13.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 14.7%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (82.9% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.24%), high school diploma (86.9% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.39%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 21.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 16.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.5%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.0%).