Immigrants from Syria vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,451,513 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Syria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.484. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Syria within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.098% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Syria corresponds to an increase of 97.9 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,218 compared to $37,857, a difference of 19.4%), median male earnings ($56,830 compared to $49,190, a difference of 15.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,858 compared to $90,909, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,494 compared to $50,041, a difference of 2.9%), householder income over 65 years ($62,303 compared to $56,722, a difference of 9.8%), and median female earnings ($40,499 compared to $36,841, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 18.7%), receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 17.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 11.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 15.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 26.3%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 23.9%), and births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.19%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.3%), and currently married (46.8% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.4%), no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 18.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 51.5%), master's degree (16.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 42.3%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.89%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.90%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 21.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 16.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age over 75 (47.8% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.8%).