Crow vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,671,707 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.817. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.303% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 303.2 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 25.0%), median household income ($63,681 compared to $78,327, a difference of 23.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $90,909, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $36,841, a difference of 4.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $50,041, a difference of 6.4%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $42,884, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 101.1%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 78.9%), and married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 68.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.6%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 26.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 33.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 231.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 229.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 227.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.9%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 18.7%), and average family size (3.82 compared to 3.34, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.050%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 35.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.37%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 92.1%), bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 13.9%), and associate's degree (37.6% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 0.35%), ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 30.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 0.81%), female disability (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.3%).