Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from Laos
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from Laos
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Laos Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,703,293 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.368. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.191% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 191.4 Immigrants from Laos.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Laos Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $37,857, a difference of 36.7%), median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $49,190, a difference of 26.5%), and median family income ($116,165 compared to $92,239, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $50,041, a difference of 8.6%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $56,722, a difference of 17.0%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Laos |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $51,770 | Tragic $37,857 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,165 | Tragic $92,239 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,319 | Tragic $78,327 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $52,361 | Tragic $42,884 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,217 | Tragic $49,190 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,571 | Tragic $36,841 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,352 | Tragic $50,041 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $106,888 | Tragic $85,553 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,914 | Tragic $90,909 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,376 | Tragic $56,722 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Exceptional 23.8% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 42.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 34.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.1%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 7.6%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Laos |
| Poverty | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 13.8% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 10.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.6% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 15.0% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 20.6% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 19.4% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.9% | Tragic 18.7% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 18.7% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 18.9% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Fair 13.0% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Tragic 22.9% |
| Single Fathers | Good 16.2% | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.4% | Tragic 30.6% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.7% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Fair 11.1% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Good 12.0% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 13.8% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Laos |
| Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.3% |
| Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Poor 5.4% |
| Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Average 5.3% |
| Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Good 11.5% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.8% | Excellent 17.1% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Good 6.6% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Average 5.5% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Fair 4.7% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Fair 4.6% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Good 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Good 5.1% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Fair 8.9% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.0% | Average 7.6% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Fair 5.5% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.70%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Laos |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Exceptional 66.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Excellent 79.9% | Fair 79.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Average 36.6% | Exceptional 40.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Exceptional 77.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.4% | Good 84.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 84.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Tragic 83.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 81.6% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 44.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 40.6%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.0%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Laos |
| Family Households | Tragic 63.4% | Exceptional 65.3% |
| Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.2% | Exceptional 29.8% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.8% | Tragic 45.1% |
| Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Exceptional 3.34 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.9% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.7% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 45.0% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 12.4% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.4% | Tragic 34.0% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 44.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 33.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 21.1%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Laos |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 91.8% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 54.1% | Exceptional 59.2% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 22.4% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 79.4%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 72.9%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 71.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Laos |
| No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 3.1% |
| Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.9% |
| Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.9% |
| 1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.8% |
| 2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.7% |
| 3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.6% |
| 4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.3% |
| 5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.0% |
| 6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 95.7% |
| 7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 94.5% |
| 8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 94.1% |
| 9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Tragic 93.2% |
| 10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 91.9% |
| 11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Tragic 90.5% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 88.9% |
| High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Tragic 86.6% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.9% | Tragic 82.7% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.6% | Tragic 61.3% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.1% | Tragic 54.7% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.9% | Tragic 40.7% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Tragic 31.6% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 3.2% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 1.4% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Laos Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 30.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 24.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.7%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Laos |
| Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.4% |
| Males | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 11.9% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 12.8% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Fair 1.3% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.2% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 13.0% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.0% | Tragic 26.1% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Tragic 49.2% |
| Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.4% |
| Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 18.1% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Poor 6.3% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |