Arab vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison
COMPARE
Arab
Immigrants from Laos
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Arabs
Immigrants from Laos
6,013
SOCIAL INDEX
57.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
166th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Laos Integration in Arab Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,390,961 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Arab communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.440. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arabs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arabs corresponds to a decrease of 4.3 Immigrants from Laos.
Arab vs Immigrants from Laos Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,662 compared to $37,857, a difference of 20.6%), median male earnings ($57,298 compared to $49,190, a difference of 16.5%), and median family income ($106,952 compared to $92,239, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,219 compared to $50,041, a difference of 2.4%), householder income over 65 years ($62,266 compared to $56,722, a difference of 9.8%), and median female earnings ($40,718 compared to $36,841, a difference of 10.5%).
Income Metric | Arab | Immigrants from Laos |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,662 | Tragic $37,857 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,952 | Tragic $92,239 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $88,398 | Tragic $78,327 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,599 | Tragic $42,884 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,298 | Tragic $49,190 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,718 | Tragic $36,841 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,219 | Tragic $50,041 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,336 | Tragic $85,553 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $104,566 | Tragic $90,909 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $62,266 | Tragic $56,722 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.6% | Exceptional 23.8% |
Arab vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 19.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.27%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.60%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.64%).
Poverty Metric | Arab | Immigrants from Laos |
Poverty | Fair 12.7% | Tragic 13.8% |
Families | Fair 9.2% | Tragic 10.2% |
Males | Poor 11.6% | Tragic 12.6% |
Females | Fair 13.7% | Tragic 15.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Poor 20.5% | Tragic 20.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Average 17.4% | Tragic 19.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.6% | Tragic 18.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Tragic 18.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Tragic 18.9% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Fair 13.0% |
Single Females | Good 20.7% | Tragic 22.9% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Good 29.0% | Tragic 30.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Fair 11.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Average 12.2% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.5% | Tragic 13.8% |
Arab vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.54%).
Unemployment Metric | Arab | Immigrants from Laos |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Fair 5.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Poor 11.8% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Excellent 17.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.4% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Fair 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.5% | Fair 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 7.9% | Average 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.6% | Fair 5.5% |
Arab vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
Labor Participation Metric | Arab | Immigrants from Laos |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Good 65.2% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.2% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 36.8% | Exceptional 40.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.6% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Poor 82.4% | Tragic 81.6% |
Arab vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 34.2%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.2%), and births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.3%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 4.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Arab | Immigrants from Laos |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Exceptional 65.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Exceptional 29.8% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Tragic 45.1% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 45.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.2% | Tragic 34.0% |
Arab vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 28.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 18.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Arab | Immigrants from Laos |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.5% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Exceptional 91.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 55.0% | Exceptional 59.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.9% | Exceptional 22.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Arab vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 55.5%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 52.2%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Arab | Immigrants from Laos |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Tragic 3.1% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Tragic 96.9% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Tragic 96.9% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.9% | Tragic 96.8% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Tragic 96.7% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Tragic 96.6% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Tragic 96.3% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Average 97.0% | Tragic 95.7% |
7th Grade | Good 96.2% | Tragic 94.5% |
8th Grade | Good 95.9% | Tragic 94.1% |
9th Grade | Good 95.1% | Tragic 93.2% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.0% | Tragic 91.9% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Tragic 90.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.6% | Tragic 88.9% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Tragic 86.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Tragic 82.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.2% | Tragic 61.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.6% | Tragic 54.7% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.0% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.9% | Tragic 31.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.4% |
Arab vs Immigrants from Laos Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 18.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.8% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.8%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 4.5%).
Disability Metric | Arab | Immigrants from Laos |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 12.4% |
Males | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.8% | Tragic 26.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.1% | Tragic 49.2% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Average 3.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |