Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,769,753 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.795. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.294% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 293.8 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 18.3%), per capita income ($43,806 compared to $37,857, a difference of 15.7%), and median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $49,190, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $50,041, a difference of 2.4%), median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $36,841, a difference of 5.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $56,722, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 33.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 30.7%), and family poverty (8.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 2.8%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.5%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.3%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 30.2%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.1%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.95%), family households (64.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.3%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.53%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 94.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 30.2%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 20.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.70%), disability (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.7%).