Choctaw vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,292,109 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.089. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 8.1 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $74,847, a difference of 4.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $78,960, a difference of 4.2%), and wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $45,371, a difference of 0.17%), median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $33,437, a difference of 1.0%), and per capita income ($35,999 compared to $35,546, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Creek communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 8.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and single father poverty (20.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 0.16%), poverty (15.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and family poverty (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 12.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.38%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.66%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.65%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.3%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.25%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.49%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Creek communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.050%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 10.6%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 13.8%), self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.7%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.030%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.53%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.57%).