Brazilian vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,642,483 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.106. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to an increase of 2.2 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,408 compared to $78,960, a difference of 32.2%), per capita income ($46,700 compared to $35,546, a difference of 31.4%), and median household income ($88,934 compared to $67,715, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income over 65 years ($61,465 compared to $51,949, a difference of 18.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $45,371, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 48.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 46.7%), and single male poverty (11.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 3.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 23.6%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 19.4%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.44%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.50%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 33.8%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 33.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 25.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 61.2%), master's degree (16.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 57.4%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and 10th grade (93.8% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 60.9%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 50.5%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 6.8%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 13.0%).