Arapaho vs Creek Community Comparison
COMPARE
Arapaho
Creek
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Arapaho
Creek
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Creek Integration in Arapaho Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,839,516 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.248. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 20.0 Creek.
Arapaho vs Creek Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Creek communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 15.6%), householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $51,949, a difference of 14.3%), and median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $46,594, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($67,965 compared to $67,715, a difference of 0.37%), median family income ($82,064 compared to $82,560, a difference of 0.61%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $45,371, a difference of 3.1%).
Income Metric | Arapaho | Creek |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,345 | Tragic $35,546 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,064 | Tragic $82,560 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,965 | Tragic $67,715 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,586 | Tragic $39,648 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $41,758 | Tragic $46,594 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $31,489 | Tragic $33,437 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,003 | Tragic $45,371 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $71,697 | Tragic $74,847 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $75,945 | Tragic $78,960 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,383 | Tragic $51,949 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.5% | Tragic 27.1% |
Arapaho vs Creek Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 30.2%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 20.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (21.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.010%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and female poverty (17.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.8%).
Poverty Metric | Arapaho | Creek |
Poverty | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 14.1% |
Females | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 17.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.2% | Tragic 24.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 24.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 21.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 21.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 16.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.4% | Tragic 27.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 24.0% | Tragic 19.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.4% | Tragic 36.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.6% | Average 10.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 14.1% |
Arapaho vs Creek Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 113.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 102.8%), and male unemployment (11.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 97.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Arapaho | Creek |
Unemployment | Tragic 9.8% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Tragic 8.8% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 25.2% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 10.3% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 7.5% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.1% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 8.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Arapaho vs Creek Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 20-64 (74.4% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Arapaho | Creek |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 61.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 74.4% | Tragic 75.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.3% | Exceptional 39.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.8% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 76.6% | Tragic 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.5% | Tragic 80.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 78.1% | Tragic 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.1% | Tragic 77.7% |
Arapaho vs Creek Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 25.4%), average family size (3.64 compared to 3.20, a difference of 13.6%), and currently married (40.5% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.2%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (66.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Arapaho | Creek |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Fair 64.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.6% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.8% | Tragic 45.3% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.64 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.5% | Poor 46.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 14.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 47.1% | Tragic 37.6% |
Arapaho vs Creek Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Creek communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 30.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 20.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.46%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Arapaho | Creek |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.7% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.2% | Exceptional 58.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 26.4% | Exceptional 21.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Arapaho vs Creek Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 28.4%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.4%), and bachelor's degree (26.6% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.030%), 10th grade (94.2% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.050%).
Education Level Metric | Arapaho | Creek |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.4% | Average 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Tragic 88.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.8% | Tragic 83.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.3% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.1% | Tragic 52.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.7% | Tragic 37.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 26.6% | Tragic 28.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 10.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.2% | Tragic 1.3% |
Arapaho vs Creek Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 45.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 29.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 3.3%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.2%).
Disability Metric | Arapaho | Creek |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 15.6% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 15.5% |
Females | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 15.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.1% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Tragic 51.5% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Tragic 4.4% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 8.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |