Czechoslovakian vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,491,338 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.206. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 43.9 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $78,960, a difference of 28.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $74,847, a difference of 27.0%), and median household income ($84,965 compared to $67,715, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $45,371, a difference of 12.9%), and median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $33,437, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 45.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 44.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 15.7%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.4%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 17.4%), and births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.73%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 2.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 0.84%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.020%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 38.1%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 35.9%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.040%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 45.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 43.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 8.9%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 10.5%).