Canadian vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 161,338,606 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.269% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 268.6 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,560 compared to $78,960, a difference of 32.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,625 compared to $74,847, a difference of 30.4%), and median household income ($87,769 compared to $67,715, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.7%), householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $45,371, a difference of 15.3%), and median female earnings ($39,724 compared to $33,437, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.7% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 45.2%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 42.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 24.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 18.6%), births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 17.6%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.45%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 7.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 0.52%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 51.0%), master's degree (15.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 49.2%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and 8th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 45.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 44.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 8.6%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 11.6%).