Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,521,577 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.613. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.390% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 390.3 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Creek communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 18.8%), median household income ($78,682 compared to $67,715, a difference of 16.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,736 compared to $74,847, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $45,371, a difference of 7.4%), median male earnings ($50,298 compared to $46,594, a difference of 8.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $51,949, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 28.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 26.2%), and single female poverty (22.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Creek communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 18.6%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 14.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.34%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (62.6% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 33.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 16.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 91.8%), master's degree (13.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 28.6%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.66%), 12th grade, no diploma (88.9% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Creek communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 48.7%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 46.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.20%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.1%).