Romanian vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,830,409 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.435. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 29.3 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,609 compared to $78,960, a difference of 37.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,544 compared to $74,847, a difference of 37.0%), and per capita income ($48,445 compared to $35,546, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $45,371, a difference of 18.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,142 compared to $51,949, a difference of 23.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 51.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 49.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.13%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.82%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 30.7%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.8%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.58%), family households (64.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.60%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 40.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 70.6%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 63.4%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 56.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.11%), 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 59.3%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 55.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 10.2%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.5%).