Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Creek Community Comparison

COMPARE

Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Creek
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Trinidadians and Tobagonians

Creek

Poor
Fair
1,572
SOCIAL INDEX
13.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
298th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Creek Integration in Trinidadian and Tobagonian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,324,077 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.220. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Trinidadians and Tobagonians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Trinidadians and Tobagonians corresponds to an increase of 16.7 Creek.
Trinidadian and Tobagonian Integration in Creek Communities

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Creek Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 40.4%), median female earnings ($40,958 compared to $33,437, a difference of 22.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,856 compared to $74,847, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,327 compared to $51,949, a difference of 6.5%), median male earnings ($51,446 compared to $46,594, a difference of 10.4%), and median family income ($94,466 compared to $82,560, a difference of 14.4%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Creek Income
Income MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCreek
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,655
Tragic
$35,546
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,466
Tragic
$82,560
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,402
Tragic
$67,715
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,820
Tragic
$39,648
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,446
Tragic
$46,594
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,958
Tragic
$33,437
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,631
Tragic
$45,371
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,856
Tragic
$74,847
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,357
Tragic
$78,960
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,327
Tragic
$51,949
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
19.3%
Tragic
27.1%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Creek Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 37.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 34.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.99%), family poverty (10.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and male poverty (13.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 7.6%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Creek Poverty
Poverty MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCreek
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Tragic
24.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
24.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
21.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Females
Fair
21.2%
Tragic
27.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
19.8%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.6%
Tragic
36.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.2%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.0%
Tragic
14.1%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Creek Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 32.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 31.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.2%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Creek Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCreek
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.6%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.2%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
8.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Poor
9.1%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.8%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Creek Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 26.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 5.1%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Creek Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCreek
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Tragic
61.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.5%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.5%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Tragic
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
77.7%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Creek Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.6%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 17.8%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.84%), births to unmarried women (36.5% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.8%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Creek Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCreek
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Fair
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.9%
Tragic
45.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.5%
Poor
46.0%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Tragic
14.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.5%
Tragic
37.6%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Creek Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 205.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 69.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 60.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 20.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.9% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 42.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 60.9%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Creek Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCreek
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
76.3%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
40.9%
Exceptional
58.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.3%
Exceptional
7.2%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Creek Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 58.5%), master's degree (14.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 36.6%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.62%), 12th grade, no diploma (89.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.95%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.0%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Creek Education Level
Education Level MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCreek
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
96.9%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.4%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.9%
Tragic
88.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.1%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.8%
Tragic
52.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.6%
Tragic
37.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.7%
Tragic
28.9%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.3%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Creek Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 75.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 50.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.2%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.9%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Creek Disability
Disability MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCreek
Disability
Average
11.7%
Tragic
15.6%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
15.5%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Poor
5.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.4%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
23.9%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Tragic
51.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
4.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
8.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.8%