Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,508,683 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.361. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($118,056 compared to $74,847, a difference of 57.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,222 compared to $78,960, a difference of 54.8%), and median household income ($104,796 compared to $67,715, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.23%), householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $45,371, a difference of 25.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,872 compared to $51,949, a difference of 34.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.5% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 79.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 70.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 64.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 41.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 27.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 22.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 50.0%), divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 40.7%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.74%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (64.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 74.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 16.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 6.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 120.1%), professional degree (6.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 112.1%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 98.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.33%), 10th grade (93.6% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.68%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 92.2%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 75.1%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 8.7%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 23.0%).