Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in North Dakota [ 101 - 200 ]

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Single Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in North Dakota

City Single Female Poverty vs State vs National
101. Glen Ullin 51.9% 23.4% (+28.4)#101 24.1% (+27.8)#16,080
102. New Rockford 52.6% 23.4% (+29.2)#102 24.1% (+28.6)#16,181
103. Hazen 53.7% 23.4% (+30.3)#103 24.1% (+29.6)#16,341
104. Center 55.2% 23.4% (+31.8)#104 24.1% (+31.1)#16,555
105. Elgin 56.5% 23.4% (+33.1)#105 24.1% (+32.4)#16,732
106. Rolette 59.1% 23.4% (+35.7)#106 24.1% (+35.0)#17,054
107. Cannon Ball 60.5% 23.4% (+37.1)#107 24.1% (+36.4)#17,258
108. Rugby 63.0% 23.4% (+39.6)#108 24.1% (+38.9)#17,519
109. Gladstone 66.7% 23.4% (+43.3)#109 24.1% (+42.6)#17,859
110. Lansford 66.7% 23.4% (+43.3)#110 24.1% (+42.6)#17,869
111. Marion 66.7% 23.4% (+43.3)#111 24.1% (+42.6)#17,907
112. Reeder 66.7% 23.4% (+43.3)#112 24.1% (+42.6)#17,919
113. Towner 68.9% 23.4% (+45.5)#113 24.1% (+44.8)#18,067
114. Kensal 72.7% 23.4% (+49.3)#114 24.1% (+48.7)#18,329
115. Four Bears Village 73.3% 23.4% (+49.9)#115 24.1% (+49.3)#18,361
116. Sherwood 75.0% 23.4% (+51.6)#116 24.1% (+50.9)#18,452
117. Page 75.0% 23.4% (+51.6)#117 24.1% (+50.9)#18,462
118. Walhalla 80.0% 23.4% (+56.6)#118 24.1% (+55.9)#18,660
119. Lignite 80.0% 23.4% (+56.6)#119 24.1% (+55.9)#18,683
120. Lakota 84.6% 23.4% (+61.2)#120 24.1% (+60.5)#18,833
121. Gackle 85.7% 23.4% (+62.3)#121 24.1% (+61.6)#18,869
122. Tappen 87.5% 23.4% (+64.1)#122 24.1% (+63.4)#18,920
123. Halliday 88.9% 23.4% (+65.5)#123 24.1% (+64.8)#18,948
124. Ryder 88.9% 23.4% (+65.5)#124 24.1% (+64.8)#18,958
125. East Dunseith 91.1% 23.4% (+67.7)#125 24.1% (+67.0)#18,993
126. Maddock 92.3% 23.4% (+68.9)#126 24.1% (+68.2)#19,008
127. Stanton 100.0% 23.4% (+76.6)#127 24.1% (+75.9)#19,268
128. Hope 100.0% 23.4% (+76.6)#128 24.1% (+75.9)#19,442
129. Hazelton 100.0% 23.4% (+76.6)#129 24.1% (+75.9)#19,590
130. Bowdon 100.0% 23.4% (+76.6)#130 24.1% (+75.9)#19,618
131. Binford 100.0% 23.4% (+76.6)#131 24.1% (+75.9)#19,665
132. Mooreton 100.0% 23.4% (+76.6)#132 24.1% (+75.9)#19,698
133. Litchville 100.0% 23.4% (+76.6)#133 24.1% (+75.9)#19,705
134. Noonan 100.0% 23.4% (+76.6)#135 24.1% (+75.9)#19,725
135. Ruthville 100.0% 23.4% (+76.6)#136 24.1% (+75.9)#19,726
136. Fingal 100.0% 23.4% (+76.6)#137 24.1% (+75.9)#19,742
137. Sanborn 100.0% 23.4% (+76.6)#138 24.1% (+75.9)#19,759
138. Egeland 100.0% 23.4% (+76.6)#139 24.1% (+75.9)#19,864
139. Pettibone 100.0% 23.4% (+76.6)#140 24.1% (+75.9)#19,920
140. Souris 100.0% 23.4% (+76.6)#141 24.1% (+75.9)#19,930
141. Nome 100.0% 23.4% (+76.6)#142 24.1% (+75.9)#19,943
142. Jud 100.0% 23.4% (+76.6)#143 24.1% (+75.9)#19,959
143. Sentinel Butte 100.0% 23.4% (+76.6)#144 24.1% (+75.9)#19,966
144. Alice 100.0% 23.4% (+76.6)#145 24.1% (+75.9)#19,967
145. Cayuga 100.0% 23.4% (+76.6)#146 24.1% (+75.9)#19,979
146. Springbrook 100.0% 23.4% (+76.6)#147 24.1% (+75.9)#19,991
147. Hansboro 100.0% 23.4% (+76.6)#148 24.1% (+75.9)#20,004