Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Chinese Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Chinese
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Chinese
14.2%
POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Chinese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,476,613 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.646 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 49.2%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | Chinese |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 81.9% | 26.1% |
| Range | 80.8% | 22.7% |
| Mean | 13.7% | 10.2% |
| Median | 12.5% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.9% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago are Spanish American Indian (14.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (14.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from El Salvador (14.3%, a difference of 0.25%), Cree (14.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (14.3%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Cree | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (9.6%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Taiwan (9.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 5.6%), Immigrants from India (9.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 5.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |