Guyanese vs Chickasaw Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Guyanese
Chickasaw
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Guyanese
Chickasaw
11.0%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
75.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guyanese vs Chickasaw Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,764,315 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Guyanese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.141 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,666,878 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 46.2%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Guyanese | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.73% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 20.7% | 51.4% |
| Range | 19.9% | 49.5% |
| Mean | 11.0% | 23.7% |
| Median | 10.9% | 21.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 18.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 27.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 9.0% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Guyanese by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Guyanese are Immigrants from North America (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (11.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Moroccan (11.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Serbian (11.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Canada (11.0%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Syrians | 79.8 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| New Zealanders | 79.3 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Ukrainians | 78.0 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 77.4 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
| Moroccans | 76.4 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 76.2 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
| Guyanese | 75.1 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | North America | 74.9 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
| Serbians | 73.6 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
| Croatians | 73.1 /100 | #160 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 70.1 /100 | #161 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 66.6 /100 | #163 | Good 11.1% |
| Pakistanis | 65.8 /100 | #164 | Good 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Pima (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.0%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and Colville (15.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |