Guyanese vs Chickasaw Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Guyanese
Chickasaw
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Guyanese
Chickasaw
41.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
306th/ 347
METRIC RANK
45.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
22.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guyanese vs Chickasaw Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,795,479 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Guyanese and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.228 and weighted average of 41.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,630 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of 45.9%, a difference of 11.0%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Guyanese | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 23.3% | 20.0% |
| Maximum | 85.4% | 65.4% |
| Range | 62.2% | 45.4% |
| Mean | 44.2% | 47.8% |
| Median | 45.0% | 48.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 36.8% | 43.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.5% | 53.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.7% | 10.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.1% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 8.6% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Guyanese by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Guyanese are Immigrants from Western Africa (41.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Crow (41.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (41.2%, a difference of 0.36%), Sioux (41.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and Haitian (41.2%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 41.8% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 41.8% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 41.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 41.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 41.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 41.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 41.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 41.4% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 41.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 41.4% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 41.2% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 41.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 41.0% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 40.9% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 40.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Taiwanese (45.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Cambodian (45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| South American Indians | 28.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 26.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 46.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 25.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 46.0% |
| Choctaw | 24.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 46.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 24.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 46.0% |
| Taiwanese | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 45.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 23.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 45.9% |
| Chickasaw | 22.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 45.9% |
| Immigrants | South America | 22.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 45.9% |
| Cambodians | 21.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 45.9% |
| Ottawa | 19.4 /100 | #198 | Poor 45.8% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 15.7 /100 | #199 | Poor 45.7% |
| Potawatomi | 15.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 45.7% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 15.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 45.7% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 14.2 /100 | #202 | Poor 45.7% |