Guyanese vs Chickasaw Poverty
COMPARE
Guyanese
Chickasaw
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Guyanese
Chickasaw
14.5%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
266th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guyanese vs Chickasaw Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,811,902 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Guyanese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 1.3%.

Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guyanese | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 3.9% | 0.99% |
Maximum | 26.8% | 35.7% |
Range | 22.9% | 34.7% |
Mean | 13.1% | 16.2% |
Median | 12.4% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.4% | 18.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Guyanese and Chickasaw by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guyanese are Immigrants from Guyana (14.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Jamaica (14.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Iroquois (14.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and Jamaican (14.4%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |