Immigrants from Canada vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 235,354,788 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Immigrant from Canada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.327. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Canada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Canada corresponds to an increase of 22.4 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,412 compared to $39,870, a difference of 23.9%), wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 19.7%), and median male earnings ($60,388 compared to $51,473, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,411 compared to $52,365, a difference of 2.0%), median female earnings ($41,373 compared to $38,528, a difference of 7.4%), and median household income ($92,029 compared to $83,395, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 45.0%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 26.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 1.6%), single male poverty (12.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.2%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.96%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 32.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.2%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.99%), family households (64.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.7%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 0.050%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.84%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 104.5%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 50.6%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 22.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 16.6%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.88%), disability (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.0%).