Immigrants from Asia vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 248,899,691 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to an increase of 1.2 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,741 compared to $39,870, a difference of 24.8%), median male earnings ($63,240 compared to $51,473, a difference of 22.9%), and median family income ($118,291 compared to $97,288, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $52,365, a difference of 7.7%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 13.4%), and median female earnings ($44,198 compared to $38,528, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 42.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 27.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.4%), single father poverty (14.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.0%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 32.1%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.9%), and births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.25%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.35, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 15.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 59.8%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 55.2%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.96%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.96%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 30.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.8%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 6.8%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 9.5%).