Malaysian vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,602,427 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.068. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to a decrease of 17.4 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 5.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,291 compared to $91,624, a difference of 3.8%), and median female earnings ($37,298 compared to $38,528, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,244 compared to $57,919, a difference of 0.56%), median male earnings ($50,772 compared to $51,473, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,615 compared to $52,365, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 13.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and receiving food stamps (12.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (17.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.19%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.67%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.54%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 3.8%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and currently married (45.9% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.030%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.83%), and average family size (3.31 compared to 3.35, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 22.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.38%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 21.0%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (41.6% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (97.3% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.60%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.8%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), female disability (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.58%), and male disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.77%).