Chilean vs Japanese Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
COMPARE
Chilean
Japanese
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Comparison
Chileans
Japanese
19.1%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.8%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
81st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Japanese Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,129,963 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 19.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 246,409,526 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.469 and weighted average of 18.8%, a difference of 1.6%.
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chilean | Japanese |
Minimum | 2.0% | 4.1% |
Maximum | 70.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 68.4% | 95.9% |
Mean | 20.1% | 23.9% |
Median | 17.5% | 20.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.9% | 17.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.4% | 22.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 17.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.0% | 17.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Japanese by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Jordan (19.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Salvadoran (19.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Sierra Leonean (19.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and Guamanian/Chamorro (19.0%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Palestinian (18.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Uruguay (18.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Indonesia (18.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Burmese (18.9%, a difference of 0.48%), and Immigrants from Armenia (18.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
Palestinians | 99.5 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Japanese | 99.5 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Burmese | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Croatians | 99.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Romanians | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Filipinos | 98.9 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Haitians | 98.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Ukrainians | 98.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 98.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Sierra Leoneans | 98.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Chileans | 98.3 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 19.1% |