Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Japanese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Japanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Japanese

Good
Fair
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,662
SOCIAL INDEX
24.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
248th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Japanese Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,434,055 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.109. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 16.5 Japanese.
Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Japanese Communities

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Japanese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($56,709 compared to $39,870, a difference of 42.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $91,624, a difference of 39.9%), and median male earnings ($70,146 compared to $51,473, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 7.3%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $52,365, a difference of 18.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $57,919, a difference of 23.6%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Japanese Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Hong KongJapanese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$56,709
Tragic
$39,870
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$131,067
Tragic
$97,288
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$111,519
Fair
$83,395
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$59,433
Tragic
$44,825
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$70,146
Tragic
$51,473
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$49,818
Tragic
$38,528
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$62,083
Good
$52,365
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$128,140
Poor
$91,624
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$127,500
Poor
$96,834
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,567
Tragic
$57,919
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.5%
Exceptional
23.8%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Japanese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 55.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 45.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 3.8%), single father poverty (14.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.8%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Japanese Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Hong KongJapanese
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
9.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.5%
Exceptional
18.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Poor
14.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Poor
18.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
17.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
17.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.5%
Fair
21.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.4%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Tragic
12.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
14.1%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Japanese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 29.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Japanese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Hong KongJapanese
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Average
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
5.8%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Japanese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 23.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Japanese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Hong KongJapanese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
65.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.4%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.5%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.6%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
81.6%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Japanese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 53.1%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 50.2%), and births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.38%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.35, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 6.9%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Japanese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Hong KongJapanese
Family Households
Exceptional
66.1%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Exceptional
29.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Exceptional
3.35
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
44.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
23.6%
Tragic
35.2%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Japanese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 19.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 13.7%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Japanese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongJapanese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.3%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Exceptional
90.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.6%
Exceptional
57.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.2%
Exceptional
21.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
7.7%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Japanese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 82.7%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 80.6%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 63.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.3% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.68%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.69%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.69%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Japanese Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Hong KongJapanese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
3.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
96.7%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
96.7%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
96.6%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
96.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Tragic
96.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
96.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
95.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Tragic
95.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Tragic
89.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Tragic
88.3%
High School Diploma
Average
89.3%
Tragic
85.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
82.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.0%
Tragic
61.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Tragic
55.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.4%
Tragic
41.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.2%
Tragic
33.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.5%
Tragic
12.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Japanese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 50.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 40.9%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 8.1%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.2%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 13.0%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Japanese Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongJapanese
Disability
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
11.7%
Females
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.95%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.9%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Average
3.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%