Celtic vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,141,778 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.186. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.218% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 217.8 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 14.6%), per capita income ($43,621 compared to $39,870, a difference of 9.4%), and median male earnings ($54,242 compared to $51,473, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($83,193 compared to $83,395, a difference of 0.24%), median female earnings ($38,283 compared to $38,528, a difference of 0.64%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,241 compared to $91,624, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 29.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 23.8%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.84%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.8%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.7%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.7%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 18.2%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.3%), married-couple households (47.3% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.52%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 105.0%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 24.1%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 42.1%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 23.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.1%).